Welcome to in-en.com! AddFavorite    Make your home page    Chinese    English
 
Search:
 
Advertisement
Total
Greatwall Drilling Company (GWDC)
Weekly Article Rank
Home -> News Center -> Coal
Coal-fired power plant in Ark. to be operating in 2010
in-en.com  2008-6-24 14:56:15  

- +

¡ª A $1.3 billion coal-fired power plant in eastern Arkansas is expected to be completed two years from now, providing much needed electricity at affordable costs, developers say.

Houston-based Dynegy Inc. and LS Power Development LLC, based in New Jersey, broke ground on Plum Point Energy Station at Osceola in May 2006. They expect to begin operating in 2010.

The 665-megawatt unit would generate power for utilities in eight states from Texas to Illinois. A proposed second unit would boost the output to 1,330 megawatts.

But environmentalists say the plant will be a major new source of pollution.

"If they build all 1,300 megawatts, it will be one of the biggest new sources of global-warming pollution in the U.S. in the last 30 years," says Bruce Nilles, director of the Sierra Club's national coal campaign.

Nilles says Plum Point also will contribute to air quality concerns in the region, regardless of any controls built into the plant.

The plant site is north of Crittenden County and Memphis, Tenn., in Shelby County. The two counties already violate federal standards for ozone pollution.

With the new plant, Nilles says, "it's like smoking with filters. Is that healthy?"

Coal-fired power plants emit carbon dioxide, the chief culprit of global warming. They release nitrogen oxides, which produce smog; sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain; mercury and particulate matter.

Plum Point officials say the plant will be outfitted with state-of-the-art pollution controls, including equipment to minimize nitrogen-oxides, scrubbers for sulfur-dioxide and filters to trap toxic mercury emissions. The plant will burn low-sulfur coal from the Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana.

However, none of the controls will deal with carbon emissions. Supporters of coal point to emerging technology that could capture and store carbon, and the industry supports proposed legislation in Congress to fund research into the technology. The use of capture-and-storage technology likely would greatly increase the cost of coal-fired plants.

Dynegy spokesman David Byford says coal remains an affordable solution to the world's energy demands and a source more available to the U.S. than foreign oil. Coal plants remain cheaper to build and operate than nuclear reactors and natural gas-fired plants.


 
Author:OSCEOLA, Ark  From:OSCEOLA, Ark  Edit:steven
[Back] [Print]
Previous:Vietnam Plans to Buy Coal From Indonesia, Thi Truong Reports
Next:BHP says approves $100 mln Indonesian coal mine
Hot Topic of the Day
· China's renewable energy project wins global green
· Wind energy development in jeopardy if Congress ni
· NamPower Plans Coal-Fired Power Plant to Supply Ur
· China's Five-Month Power Demand Rises 12£¥ on Growi
· Felix, Centennial Surge on Coal Price, Profit Outl
· Coking Coal Forecasts Raised 50£¥ by UBS on Constra
· China Power Stocks Gain as Government Raises Tarif
· China coal price freeze could tighten supply
· Natural gas tops Myanmar exports in 2007-08
· IBM, Tokyo Ohka join hands to develop solar techno
Advanced Control Systems
 
Commend Article Rank
· Newcastle Coal Price Falls to 9-Week Low on Holida
· CTL plants proliferate as China taps vast coal res
· Eskom Says South African Power Outages Will Worsen
· Coal, iron ore shipping rates rise to record for a
· Exxon Project May Lead Australian Region LNG, JPMo
· Newcastle Coal Price Reaches Record for Fifth Week
· Prudential Buys Stake in U.K. Wind Power Owner Zep
· China to build Asia's largest coal chemical base t
· China Raises Coal Prices for South Korea Above Jap
· Goldman Raises Coking Coal Price Forecast on Deman
About us | Contact | Copyright © 2007 IN-en.com. All rights reserved.